MGMT455 U1 IP Theory X & Y Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

MGMT455 U1 IP Theory X & Y - Research Paper Example This theory tends to adopt the authoritarian style of management. Whereas, Theory Y assumes that individuals take responsibility and they do not need control and direction on each step, they are active, motivated and consider the work as the natural part of their lives, and are capable of achieving higher goals in their jobs. This theory is considered is the participative style of management. One style cannot be used in all situations. It totally depends on the circumstances and conditions of the environment and employees. The management can be authoritative in some cases and can also be practical in other cases while a mix of both the theories can result better. The practices of Theory Y can turn out with better results as this will develop confidence and courage among the employees to work in a relaxed and a comfortable environment. For-example, well and high structured call center operations can get a certain amount of benefits by allowing their employees to perform and respond to customers on their comfort and knowledge level. So, by adapting to Theory Y practices they can appreciate and encourage the overall knowledge sharing processes. The difference between Theory X and Theory Y management is quite noticeable. In my opinion, the management of Theory Y is much more effective and productive than Theory X, as the authoritarian management of Theory X is much adopted in most of the huge firms and organization and leaves less comfortable environment for the employees, whereas most of the organizations allow participative management of the employees which prefer self motivation and appreciate new ideas from the individuals. Considering Theory Y management, many of the organizations use decision making processes, in which each employee has the opportunity to share his thoughts and ideas. There are basically two major types of democratic decision making, including, persuasive democratic management and consultative

Assignment 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Assignment 3 - Essay Example We are now more than ever connected as a social society in new ways. The boundaries that once separated wireless mobility, the Internet, computing and media are now being merged together to create a more mobile, 2.0 connected social society. Many of the devices that consumers use on a daily basis are now connected to the web. These connections allow them to link to resources, people, information, and entertainment. These connections are now defining the expectations for communication devices as people are undergoing new social behaviors and consumer expectations. (www.motorola.com) As of now, â€Å"Motorola’s Mobile Device portfolio includes a broad array of converged devices including smartphones based on the Android operating system, led by the highly successful DROID family of products, as well as the tablets and Bluetooth accessories.† These devices service the needs of businesses and consumers by delivering Internet services, phone, email, social networking and ent ertainment all in one small device. (www.motorola.com) In the past Motorola was great at developing new products, yet they always seemed to ‘lack a viable product map and continued to lose market share to competing vendors that were consistently bringing better products to the market.’ (Martin, Richard) It seems as though Motorola’s new products such as the Android phones and the Xoom tablet held high expectations in making a dent in the portable communication device market share as well. However, after the release of the Xoom, Motorola continued to put more pressure on their sales efforts by releasing more Android based operating system tablets. It appears as though they may be falling back into old habits as these products are failing expectations even with the credible partnership of Google Inc., a company that a great track record when it comes to mobile operating systems. The Xoom has been labeled in the media as a â€Å"promising, but unpolished product.â €  The product was set at a premium price of $599, and has failed to compete with its main competition, the thinner and lighter Apple iPad 2. Overall, the sales picture isn’t inspiring. Motorola’s key strengths have always been at creating innovative products and forging relationships with service providers ahead of the curve. The Motorola Razr, was introduced in 2004, and was a huge hit. However, they saw an instant share price decline as competitors took their ideas and brought better products to the market. Motorola missed the boat when they split the company into two divisions, the struggling mobile phone business and its broadband and mobility solutions unit. They are now paying for that mistake as they have come to realize that the interconnected future of mobile communications devices was soon to come. Motorola made the right move in partnering with Google, and for forming a competitive OS system like Android to compete with Apple. However, they did not think about the application and infrastructure the same way as Apple. Motorola’s weakness continues to remain the same, as they develop great products ahead of the tech curve, yet they fail to implement a product map for effective product release and application support. The anticipation for the Xoom was not comparable to that of Apple’s iPad products. This is because they release products as soon as they come out without an overall brand strategy and interface direction. It is Apple’